|
Imagine
your 12 to 15 month old baby; learning
to talk, learning to walk, laughing
and interacting with you, giving you
kisses. You take your child into the
pediatrician for their regular
check-up and vaccinations. Children at
this age now receive up to four shots
at a single visit. Within four to six
weeks after their check-up your child
has stopped talking, stopped
interacting with you – your child has
developed regressive autism.
Regressive autism describes children
who were developing normally and then
cease to develop further language and
social skills. Not only do they cease
to continue to develop, they lose the
language and social skills they had
gained in their young lives. How
devastating!
Recent evaluation of autism and autism
spectrum disorder demonstrates that
the number of children with
‘regressive’ autism is much higher
than previously published; as high as
41% of autism or autism spectrum
diagnoses. But what can possibly be
contained within these childhood
vaccines that could make them so
potentially unsafe?
The new Mumps-Measles-Rubella vaccine,
"MMR II" vaccine that was introduced
to the US in 1979 and then to the UK
in 1988 was unique in more ways than
just the measles component which was
added to it. The new MMR II vaccine
contains human DNA fragments. These
DNA fragments are the result of the
way in which this new vaccine was
produced. MMR II was manufactured
using aborted fetal cells, i.e., human
cells from an aborted fetus -- an
aborted baby.
Previous vaccines were made using
animal cells. The earlier versions of
these newer vaccines produced using
aborted fetal cells, such as MMR II,
don’t even inform consumers (parents)
that residual aborted fetal DNA is
injected into their children with each
vaccine.
MERCK
PHARMACEUTICAL - MMR II VACCINE
(product description)
More recently introduced vaccines that
use aborted fetal cells do inform
consumers that it contains
contaminating residual DNA from the
‘human diploid cell’. However, this
technical jargon does not fully inform
the consumer (parent) that a ’human
diploid cell’ is actually a cell from
an aborted fetus.
MERCK
PHARMACEUTICAL - VARICELLA VIRUS
VACCINE (product description)
There are obvious numerous issues of
concern here. First and foremost is
the moral aspect of what has been done
to produce these vaccines. Electively
(voluntarily) aborted human fetuses
were specifically selected and
processed in order to create cell
lines for vaccine production. This is
documented in publicly available FDA
meeting minutes.
FDA - use of aborted human fetus in
experimentation - (see
from page 77 onward ).
This was not just a one time
occurrence, as many would like to
believe. The use of 'fresh',
electively aborted fetal material and
aborted fetal cell lines is pervasive
in the biotechnology and
pharmaceutical industry. The public
needs to be concerned with the ethics
of these companies and the scientists
who choose to work with them.
Another issue of concern to us all,
regardless of one’s own personal
opinion about the morals of abortion,
is the issue of informed consent. As a
society, we are mindful of this in
many areas of our lives, including our
food packaging. We have the Nutrition
Labeling and Education Act of 1992
that guarantees consumers can easily
discover what is in the food they
purchase. For example, someone who is
a vegetarian can easily see from food
labeling if the product contains meat
or meat by-products. Everyone agrees
that they have the RIGHT
TO KNOW if meat products are
contained in their foods or were used
in the preparation of the food they
are purchasing. Yet, there is no law
guaranteeing full disclosure about the
use of aborted fetal cell lines to
produce our vaccines, other medicines
or even beauty products. There is no
law requiring full disclosure about
the presence of contaminating aborted
fetal DNA in those drugs and vaccines.
Don’t
you want to know exactly what they
are injecting into our children?
BUT
HOW DOES DNA IN VACCINES FROM ABORTED
FETUSES TRIGGER AUTISM ?
The safety of injecting our children
with aborted human fetal DNA has been
debated for over 40 years, but has
never been properly studied. Safety
concerns about injecting this
'residual' DNA from an aborted fetus
into our children include:
(1) The
potential for subsequent
autoimmune disease. This
is triggered by a child’s immune
system recognizing the contaminating
DNA injected into them, and then
subsequently generating antibodies
to attack it. However, the child's
antibodies will also attack their
own body's similar DNA, treating it
as it would a foreign substance and
thereby creating an autoimmune
reaction.
(2) The
potential for the child's body to
accept the foreign DNA of the
aborted fetus and inserting the
contaminated DNA into a child’s
own genes. The FDA’s
concerns about the potential for
insertion of the contaminating human
DNA have focused on "oncogenesis",
or tumor formation. Concerns about
the potential for residual
contaminating DNA to insert into a
child's own genome and thus disrupt
the function of tumor suppressor
genes have been demonstrated in the
laboratory and also in humans.
Contaminated DNA could cause tumors
to form.
(3) The
potential for inserted foreign DNA
of the aborted fetus that is
contained in vaccines, to
ultimately lead to autism
disorders for children. It
is believed that the contaminated
human fetal DNA in the vaccines
reaches the neurons in the brain of
a young child and is taken-up into
the nerve endings where it can be
transported up the nerve's axon to
the brain. This triggers a response
that can include the symptoms of
autism. Such renowned researchers as
Helen Ratajczak have published their
own scientific findings on the link
between autism and DNA in vaccines
from aborted fetuses. She concludes
that the body of the child responds
to the foreign DNA of the aborted
fetus by triggering an inflammation
reaction. Brains cells die and the
inflammation continues ongoing in
the brain throughout the life of the
child. This is believed to be the
triggering mechanism for
vaccine-related autism cases.
Gene therapy clinical trials in human
children have shown us the dangers of
DNA insertion into our genome. In gene
(DNA) therapy clinical trials for 'X'
linked SCID disease (i.e., "bubble
boys"), it was shown that 4 out of 9
patients had unanticipated,
inappropriate DNA insertion that
disrupted a tumor suppressor gene,
leading to acute lymphocytic leukemia
in these boys. This affects boys in
particular because the SCID disease
disrupts the 'X' chromosome, of which
boys only have one, while girls have
two.
DNA
insertion led to leukemia in SCID
patients
Other methods of producing vaccines
without human DNA fragments have
existed for many years and they are
proven. So, there is NO good reason
why the pharmaceutical industry must
continue with the unsafe method of
vaccine production that is based on
human DNA from aborted fetuses.
Do
you want a child's vaccine to
contain material that could cause
autism, cause autoimmune reactions
and cause tumors? Of course not.
That's why Caring For All Kids
reminds you, "The more you know --
the more you care."
Isn't it time we all work
together to get the word out to each
other, to the news media, to the
scientists, to the pharmaceutical
companies -- that we want to make
children's vaccines safe?
|
